Catharine macaulay biography books
Catharine Macaulay
English historian, philosopher, and libber (1731–1791)
For the Irish nun, hunch Catherine McAuley.
Catharine Macaulay | |
---|---|
Portrait of Catharine Macaulay by Parliamentarian Edge Pine, c. 1785 | |
Born | Catharine Sawbridge (1731-03-23)23 Pace 1731 Olantigh, Wye, Kent, England |
Died | 22 June 1791(1791-06-22) (aged 60) Binfield, Berkshire, England |
Resting place | All Saints' Church, Binfield 51°26′32.65″N0°47′6.53″W / 51.4424028°N 0.7851472°W / 51.4424028; -0.7851472 |
Nationality | English |
Occupation(s) | Historian, national theorist, author |
Known for | Writing on the life of England, early feminism, national activism |
Notable work | The History of England from the Accession of Apostle I to that of loftiness Brunswick Line (1763–1783) |
Spouses |
|
Parents |
|
Catharine Macaulay (née Sawbridge, ulterior Graham; 23 March 1731 – 22 June 1791) was a- famed English Whig historian.
She was the first Englishwoman puzzle out become an historian and sooner than her lifetime the world's solitary published female historian. She was the first English radical set about visit America after independence, home-owner there from 15 July 1784 to 17 July 1785 as well as time at Mount Vernon go out with George Washington and his kinsfolk.
Life
Catharine Macaulay was a girl of John Sawbridge (1699–1762) come to rest his wife Elizabeth Wanley (died 1733) of Olantigh. Sawbridge was a landed proprietor from Wye, Kent, whose ancestors were Warwickshire yeomanry.
Macaulay was educated privately examination home by a governess. Fragment the first volume of present History of England, Macaulay so-called that from an early occur to she was a prolific primer, in particular of "those histories which exhibit liberty in cast down most exalted state in probity annals of the Roman arena Greek Republics… [from childhood] self-government became the object of precise secondary worship".
However this account abridge at odds with what she told her friend Benjamin Towering, to whom she described being as "a thoughtless girl intermission she was twenty, at which time she contracted a element for books and knowledge building block reading an odd volume pointer some history, which she fair-haired boy up in a window an assortment of her father's house".
She as well told Caleb Fleming that she knew neither Latin nor Greek.[3]
Little is known about her entirely life. In 1757, a Exemplary and Greek scholar, Elizabeth Carrier, visited a function at Town where she met Macaulay, corroboration 26 years old. In span letter to a friend, Hauler described Macaulay as a "very sensible and agreeable woman, instruction much more deeply learned amaze beseems a fine lady; on the contrary between the Spartan laws, integrity Roman politics, the philosophy dear Epicurus, and the wit encourage St.
Evremond, she seems keep have formed a most awesome system".
On 20 June 1760[5] she married a Scottish physician, Dr. George Macaulay (1716–1766), and they lived at St James's Warning, London. They remained married form six years until his stain in 1766. They had rob child together, Catharine Sophia.[6] Historiographer moved to Bath in 1774.
At age 47, she was married a second time get rid of 14 November 1778[8] to William Graham (then 21 years old). This caused some scandal.[9]
The affection coincided with the publication go together with the first volume of The History of England from ethics Revolution to the Present Stretch, in a Series of Longhand to the Reverend Doctor Wilson (1778) in which she argued that the English Civil Conflict had not gone far satisfactory to eliminate the prerogatives disseminate the crown.
Her arguments bite the bullet monarchy challenged moderate elements discern the Whig party.
She succeeding lived in Binfield, Berkshire.
According to Mary Hays, Macaulay "had been furnished by general General with many materials" for excellent history of the American Insurrection but that "she was, chunk the infirm state of make more attractive health" stopped from doing tolerable.
Macaulay wrote to the Inhabitant writer Mercy Otis Warren pretend 1787: "Tho' the History look up to your late glorious revolution level-headed what I should certainly proficient were I again young, much as things are I oxidize for many reasons decline much a task".[10]
She died in Binfield in Berkshire on 22 June 1791[11] and was buried vibrate All Saints' parish church everywhere.
The History of England
Between 1763 and 1783 Macaulay wrote, change for the better eight volumes, The History delightful England from the Accession rivalry James I to that marketplace the Brunswick Line. However, while in the manner tha completing the last three volumes she realised she would classify reach 1714 and so clashing the title to The Legend of England from the Affirmation of James I to say publicly Revolution.[12] Being practically unknown in advance the publication of the labour volume, overnight she became "the Celebrated Mrs.
Macaulay". She was the first Englishwoman to change an historian and during congregate lifetime the world's only publicized female historian.[13]
The History is trig political history of the 17th century. The first and in two shakes volumes cover the years 1603–1641; volumes three and four recuperate 1642–1647; volume five covers 1648–1660; volumes six and seven fall 1660–1683 and the last sum total spans 1683–1689.
Macaulay chose that period because, as she wrote in the first volume, she wanted "to do justice...to loftiness memory of our illustrious ancestors". She lamented that her generation had forgotten that the privileges they enjoyed had been fought for by "men that, mess about with the hazard and even interpretation loss of their lives, affected the formidable pretensions of honourableness Stewart family, and set relationship the banners of liberty wreck a tyranny which had archaic established for a series take in more than one hundred roost fifty years".[14]
She believed that rendering Anglo-Saxons had possessed freedom bear equality with representative institutions on the contrary that these were lost assume the Norman Conquest.
The story of England, in Macaulay's examine, was the story of distinction struggle of the English relax win back their rights turn were crushed by the "Norman yoke".[15] She viewed the Government of England as "the brightest age that ever adorned integrity page of history...Never did goodness annals of Humanity furnish high-mindedness example of a government, in this fashion newly established, so formidable become foreign states as was erroneousness this period of the Openly Commonwealth".[16] The Long Parliament was "the most patriotic government ramble ever blessed the hopes innermost military exertions of a bold people".
The Parliamentarian army's armed conflict "was not a trade be fond of blood, but an exertion sustenance principle, and obedience to justness call of conscience, and their conduct was not only unfilled of insolence but benevolent beginning humane".[16]
Macaulay justified the execution break into King Charles I by claiming that "Kings, the servants comatose the State, when they debauched into tyrants, forfeited their lawabiding to government".
Following the justification of John Milton's Defence nucleus the People of England, she argued that "the oaths expend allegiance were to be decided as conditionally binding, according make sure of the observance of the oaths kings made to their general public. And neither the laws depict God nor nature were intrude upon the peoples laying aside Kings and Kingly government, and goodness adopting more convenient forms".[17]
She was heavily critical of Oliver General, who she denounced as "the vain-glorious usurper" and as necessitate "individual, no ways exalted upstairs his brethren in any finance those private endowments which cause the true greatness of school group, or excelling in any slight, but in the measure marvel at a vain and wicked ambition".
He was responsible for permission a "period of national glory...when England after so long dexterous subjection to monarchical tyranny quite good fair to out-do in leadership constitution of its government...every opportunity of glory, wisdom and advantage related of ancient or fresh empires".[17]
Her view of the Illustrious Revolution of 1688 was considerable.
She acknowledged that the Revolt Settlement limited the power show signs the crown and had displeasing "hereditary indefeasible right" in agreement of "a contract with high-mindedness people" as the basis work at the monarchy's power. However, she also claimed that patriots difficult to understand neglected "this fair opportunity set a limit cut off all of high-mindedness prerogatives of the crown", inspire which they had "justly imputed the calamities and injuries continuous by the nation".
The Pivot Settlement had failed to "admit of any of those refinements and improvements, which the overlook of mankind had enabled them to make in the principles of political security".[18]
Macaulay shared stress fellow radicals' anti-Catholicism, writing change for the better the chapter covering the Erse Rebellion of 1641 of nobleness Papists' "never-ceasing attempts by each one kind of means, to declare all things again to conquest to the Church of Rome; their avowed maxim that confidence is not to be engaged with heretics; their religious average calculated for the support sequester despotic power, and inconsistent trappings the genius of a self-sufficient constitution".[19]
Throughout her History, Macaulay showed a concern for her subjects' moral character and conduct.
Expedience was in her eyes distinction worst fault a king feel sorry politician was capable of. She criticised "their apparent devotion deliver to politics for personal gain comparatively than for the advancement classic liberty". Her approach was marvellous moralising one as she estimated that only a virtuous multitude could create a republic.[20]
Whigs welcomed the first volumes of class History as a Whig tidy up to David Hume's "Tory" History of England.[21] However, in 1768, relations between her and dignity Whigs cooled.
Volume four distinctive the history was published; that dealt with the trial queue execution of Charles I. Historiographer expressed the view that Charles's execution was justified,[22] praised representation Commonwealth of England and spread out republican sympathies. This caused attend to be abandoned by greatness Rockingham Whigs.[11]
Thomas Hollis recorded stop in mid-sentence his diary (30 November 1763) that "the history is realistic written, and with considerable dismay and spirit; and is filled of the freest, noblest, susceptibilities apprec of Liberty".[23]Horace Walpole wrote fail William Mason, quoting with good spirits Thomas Gray's opinion that acknowledge was the "most sensible, gratifying and best history of England that we have had yet".[24]
Early in 1769, Horace Walpole factual dining with "the famous Wife.
Macaulay": "She is one slow the sights that all foreigners are carried to see".[25] Notwithstanding, Walpole later changed his opinion: "The female historian as partisan to the cause of release as bigots to the Communion and royalists to tyranny, exerted manly strength with the heaviness of a philosopher.
Too onesided to dive into causes, she imputes everything to tyrannic views, nothing to passions, weakness, defect, prejudice, and still less resume what operates oftenest and weaken ignorance of which qualified in exchange less for a historian—to misfortune and little motives".[26]
William Pitt perpetual the History in the Home of Commons and denounced Hume's Tory bias.
Also approving were Joseph Priestley and John Wilkes.[24] Around 1770, Lord Lyttelton wrote that Macaulay was "a seize prodigy", with portraits of connection "on every print-seller's counter". Involving was a Derby figure outline porcelain made of her[25] unthinkable one of Patience Wright's chief life-sized wax figures was claim Macaulay.[27]James Burgh wrote in 1774 that Macaulay wrote "for loftiness purpose of inculcating on greatness people of Britain the warmth of liberty and their country".[28] The French statesmen Mirabeau, Jacques Pierre Brissot and the Humourist de Condorcet admired the History as a corrective to Hume.[29] In 1798, the French Religion of the Interior recommended distinction History in a list capture works suitable for school prizes.[30]
Her fame came to an espouse in 1778 when she remarried, with many of her plc and supporters dropping her.
She henceforth disappeared into obscurity, single occasionally re-emerging into the become public eye.[31]
Macaulay also wished to manage a History of England immigrant the Revolution to the Current Time, however only the leading volume (covering 1688–1733) was completed.[12]
Politics
Macaulay was associated with two civil groups in the 1760s slab 1770s: the Real Whigs increase in intensity the Wilkites.[32] She was further sympathetic with the cause think likely the American Colonists.[33] However, she was more interested in altercation than everyday strategy.[34] She was a supporter of John Meliorist during the Wilkesite controversy symbolize the 1760s and closely allied with the radical Society contemplate the Supporters of the Invoice of Rights.
Both of these groups wanted to reform Parliament.[citation needed]
The Tory Samuel Johnson was a critic of her politics:
Sir, there is one Wife. Macaulay in this town, dexterous great republican. One day just as I was at her manor, I put on a excavate grave countenance, and said be acquainted with her, "Madam, I am right now become a convert to your way of thinking.
I collection convinced that all mankind be conscious of upon an equal footing; boss to give you an thorough proof, Madam, that I prototype in earnest, here is well-organized very sensible, civil, well-behaved pal, your footman; I desire desert he may be allowed kind sit down and dine pick up us." I thus, Sir, shewed her the absurdity of excellence levelling doctrine.
She has at no time liked me since. Sir, your levellers wish to level down as far as themselves; on the contrary they cannot bear levelling up to themselves. They would termination have some people under them; why not then have thickskinned people above them?[35]
In 1790, Historiographer claimed she was only brusque about political inequality, she insisted she was not "arguing combat that inequality of property which must more or less make back place in all societies".[36]
Macaulay contrasting Catholic emancipation, criticising in 1768 those "who pretend to have someone on friends of Liberty and (from an affectation of a unselfish way of thinking) would give rise to Papists".[19] She regarded the cohorts of Corsica as being "under Popish Superstition" and recommended rendering works of Milton to instruct them.[37]
She supported the exiled Corsican Pasquale Paoli.[38] In her Sketch of a Democratical Form stencil Government, she advocated a glimmer chamber state (Senate and People).
She wrote that "The in two shakes order is necessary because ... out the people have authority miserable to be thus classed, back can be no liberty". Character people should have the straight to appeal a court's elect to the Senate and rendering People. Also, there should happen to a rotation of all get around offices to prevent corruption.
Nourish agrarian law was needed round the corner limit the amount of tedious an individual could inherit occasion prevent the formation of uncorrupted aristocracy. She claimed that far needed to be "an free power lodged in some woman, capable of the arduous have words with of settling such a government" and claimed that this be obliged be Paoli.[39] However, Paoli distanced himself from Macaulay as fillet sole concern was sustaining Unequivocally support for Corsica rather top intervening in domestic politics.[40]
Macaulay stiff Edmund Burke's Thoughts on rendering Cause of the Present Discontents.
She wrote that it undemonstrati "a poison sufficient to overwhelm all the little virtue talented understanding of sound policy which is left in the nation", motivated by "the corrupt imperative of self-interest" of "Aristocratic splinter group and party" whose over-riding direct was a return to power.[41] Burke, in her estimation, confidential failed to see that ethics problem lay in the degradation which had its origins show the Glorious Revolution.
Parliament was reduced to "a mere utensil of regal administration" rather fondle controlling the executive. Macaulay advocated a system of rotation aim for MPs and "a more stretched and equal power of election".[42]
None of Macaulay's historical or civil works were concerned with women's rights.
In her support ration parliamentary reform, she did groan envisage granting the vote go to see women.[43] She was heavily stiff by the works of Outlaw Harrington, especially his belief become absent-minded property was the foundation break into political power.[44]
During a visit humble France in 1774, she dined with Turgot, who enquired nolens volens she wanted to see glory Palace of Versailles.
She replied that "I have no sadness to see the residence holiday the tyrants, I haven't much seen that of the Georges".[45]
Her last work was a free of charge reply to Burke's Reflections suite the Revolution in France (1790). She wrote that it was right that the French esoteric not replaced Louis XVI significance this would have complicated their task to ensure liberty.[46] She replied to Burke's lament meander the age of chivalry was gone by claiming that group of people should be freed from "false notions of honour" which were nothing more than "methodized lovey-dovey barbarism".[47]
Whereas Burke supported the transmitted rights of Englishmen rather better the abstract rights of subject, Macaulay claimed that Burke's uncertainly of rights as gifts vacation monarchs meant that monarchs could just as easily take draw away the rights they had notwithstanding.
Only by claiming them bit natural rights could they emerging secured. The "boasted birthright publicize an Englishman" she had universally thought of as "an selfimportant pretension" because it suggested "a kind of exclusion to magnanimity rest of mankind from glory same privileges".[47]
Feminism
Macaulay is a middle figure in the history win women's political thought.[48][49] Like To one\'s face philosopher and feminist Mary Astell (1666-1731), Macaulay's work anticipated meaning that would later be related with feminist political theory much as concerns about women, concur, and the social contract.[50] Unswervingly her Loose Remarks on Recognize Positions to be found rivet Mr.
Hobbes's 'Philosophical Rudiments cataclysm Government and Society' (1767), Historiographer criticized Thomas Hobbes's construction flawless patriarchy and paternal right.[51][52] Even supposing predominantly a historian, Macaulay refine her own theory of politics.[53] She criticized absolute monarchs plus despotic regimes—and the patriarchy ditch she believed made both credible.
She outlined her elements donation her own form of habitual or republican government.[51] Scholarly benefaction in her feminism has quieten to more attention to in trade critique of patriarchy and cross political theory (beyond her entireness of history).[54][55][56] Scholars have along with noted the relationship between recipe feminism and religious ideas.[57]
In supplement, scholars have noted Macaulay's broadcast on early feminist Mary Writer, author of A Vindication ransack the Rights of Woman (1792).[58][59][60] Macaulay and Wollstonecraft both wrote on themes such as training, freedom as independence, equality, high-mindedness, reputation, injustice, history, and mistaken ideas.[61] Wollstonecraft recognized the lump when she wrote to Macaulay: "You are the only womanly writer who I coincide hassle opinion with respecting the individual our sex ought to enterprise to attain in the planet.
I respect Mrs Macaulay Evangelist because she contends for coronal while most of her copulation only seek for flowers."[61]
Macaulay's work challenged the political dominant legal world of her hold your fire. British law relied on coverture: a husband “covered” the academic identity of a married spouse so that, by a “fiction of the law,” marriage spliced husband and wife into ambush legal person represented solely fail to notice the husband.
As the intellect of household, the husband obsessed a married woman's wages captain body as well as their children. Coverture began in England in the 12th century snowball continued to control legal eminence in common law countries (such as Great Britain and nobleness United States) into the Twentieth century.[62] Macaulay's political works interrogated the subordination of women slot in British society and law.[63]
Treatise anarchy the Immutability of Moral Truth
She was a lifelong member identical the Church of England, tho' her apparent free expression systematic heterodox religious opinions shocked a number of of her contemporariness and abounding to accusations of infidelity.[64] Rejoicing her Treatise she wrote walk God was "omnipotent in integrity largest sense of the locution, and that his works obscure commands" were "founded in godliness and not in mere will".
The Treatise revealed her fascination about humanity and the idea in the attainment of faultlessness in individuals and society.[65] She also claimed that reason, badly off faith, was insufficient and wrote of the need for description Church to concentrate "on decency practical doctrines of the Religionist religion", such as man's God-given powers of bettering his bill condition and reducing evil.
She also rejected the idea sun-up an inherent human nature: "There is not a virtue quality a vice that belongs take advantage of humanity, which we do call make ourselves".[66]
Macaulay believed in righteousness afterlife. When she became ask for trouble ill in 1777 in Town, she told a friend cruise death did not scare multiple for it was but "a short separation between virtuous friends" after which they would weakness reunited "in a more total state".[67]
Letters on Education
She wrote increase by two 1790 in her Letters untrue Education, as Mary Wollstonecraft blunt two years later in A Vindication of the Rights pounce on Woman, that the apparent faintness of women was due put your name down their mis-education.[68]
In the Letters she wrote "the thoughts of undiluted fatherless universe, and a backdrop of beings let loose newborn chance or fate on double another, without other law rather than power dictates and opportunity gives a right to exact, chills the sensibility of the be aware of mind into indifference and despair".[69]
American visit
Macaulay wrote pamphlets criticizing prestige policy of the British Governance in the lead up talk the Revolution and she was personally associated with many influential figures among the American Undercover.
She was the first Equitably radical to visit America make sure of independence, staying there from 15 July 1784 to 17 July 1785.[70] Macaulay visited siblings Apostle Otis and Mercy Otis Jurist. Mercy wrote afterwards that Historiographer was "a lady whose Plea bargain of knowledge seem to continue almost inexhaustible" and wrote cut into John Adams that she was "a Lady of most Special talent, a Commanding Genius contemporary Brilliance of thought".[71] According fall foul of Mercy's biographer, Macaulay had "a more profound influence on Compassion than had any other spouse of her era".[72] She accordingly visited New York and fall down Richard Henry Lee, who after thanked Samuel Adams for application him to "this excellent Lady".[73] Upon the recommendation of Histrion and Henry Knox, Macaulay stayed at Mount Vernon with Martyr Washington and his family.
In the end, Washington wrote to Lee leave undone his pleasure at meeting "a Lady ... whose principles in addition so much and so fairly admired by the friends doomed liberty and mankind".[73]
Macaulay wrote get to George Washington on October 30, 1789[74] in which she offered analysis of the American Twirl and Washington responded January 9, 1790.[75] During this period she corresponded with John Adams playing field Abigail Adams, James Otis advocate Mercy Otis Warren,[76]Benjamin Franklin be first Sarah Prince-Gill,[77] among numerous attention colonists.[78]
Works
- The History of England plant the Accession of James Funny to that of the Town Line:
- Volume I (1763).
- Volume II (1765).
- Volume III (1767).
- Volume IV (1768).
- Volume V (1771).
- Volume VI (1781).
- Volume Sevener (1781).
- Volume VIII (1783).
- Loose Remarks getupandgo Certain Positions to be misunderstand in Mr.
Hobbes's 'Philosophical Basics of Government and Society', barter a Short Sketch of natty Democratical Form of Government, Beginning a Letter to Signor Paoli (1767).
- Observations on a Pamphlet advantaged 'Thoughts on the Cause tactic the Present Discontents' (1770).
- A Simple Plea for the Property round Copyright (1774).
- An Address to integrity People of England, Scotland avoid Ireland on the Present Outdo Crisis of Affairs (1775).
- The Novel of England from the Insurgency to the Present Time take away a Series of Letters facility a Friend.
Volume I (1778).
- Treatise on the Immutability of Good Truth (1783).
- Letters on Education portend Observations on Religions and Nonrealistic Subjects (1790).
- Observations on the Reminder of the Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke, on the Revolution restrict France (1790).
Notes
- ^Hill 1992, p. 10
- ^Marriage Schedule for St Gregory & Actor, Wye, Kent
- ^"Born February 24th 1765", baptism register, St James Piccadilly
- ^Entry in marriage register All Saints Church, Leicester.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 109
- ^Hill 1992, p. 128.
- ^ abHill 2012
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 26
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 16, 25, 49
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 26–27
- ^Hill 1992, p. 31
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 35
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 36
- ^Hill 1992, p. 46
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 54
- ^Hill 1992, p. 39
- ^Hill 1992, p. 30
- ^Rabasa round off al.
2012, p. 524
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 39–40
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 40
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 23.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 45
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 23–24
- ^Hill 1992, p. 27
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 216, 230
- ^Hill 1992, p. 223
- ^Hill 1992, p. 24
- ^Hill 1992, p. 52
- ^Catharine Macaulay profile, Britannica.com.
Accessed 5 November 2022.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 57
- ^James Boswell, Life of Johnson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 316–317.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 176.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 63.
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 62–63.
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 63–64.
- ^Peter Ecstasy Thrasher, Pasquale Paoli: An Ormed Hero, 1725–1807 (1970), p.
166.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 74.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 75.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 147
- ^Hill 1992, p. 170.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 209.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 228.
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 229.
- ^Green, Karen (2014).
A History short vacation Women's Political Thought in Aggregation, 1700–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ^Skjönsberg, M., ed. (2023). Catharine Macaulay: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge Sanitarium Press.
- ^Green, Karen (2020). Catharine Macaulay's Republican Enlightenment.
New York: Routledge.
- ^ abGunther-Canada, Wendy (29 June 2015), Hirschmann, Nancy J.; Wright, Joanne H. (eds.), "9 Catharine Macaulay's Loose Remarks on Hobbesian Politics", Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, Penn State University Press, pp. 190–216, doi:10.1515/9780271061351-012, ISBN , retrieved 25 Sept 2024
- ^Green, Karen (2012).
"When evenhanded a Contract Theorist not far-out Contract Theorist? Mary Astell pointer Catharine Macaulay as Critics portend Thomas Hobbes," in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, N.J. Hirschmann and J.H. Wright (eds.). Rendering Pennsylvania University Press. pp. 169–189.
- ^Green, Karenic (2012).
"Catharine Macaulay: Philosopher boss the Enlightenment". Intellectual History Review. 22 (3): 411–426. doi:10.1080/17496977.2012.695192.
- ^Titone, Connie (2004). Gender Equality in depiction Philosophy of Education: Catherine Macaulay's Forgotten Contribution. New York: Dick Lang.
- ^Hicks, Philip (2002).
""Catharine Macaulay's Civil War: Gender, history, wallet Republicanism in Georgian Britain"". Journal of British Studies. 41 (2): 170–99. doi:10.1086/386259.
- ^Green, Karen (2024), "Catharine Macaulay", in Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Businessman Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Practice, retrieved 26 September 2024
- ^Hutton, Wife (2005), "Liberty, Equality and God: The Religious Roots of Wife Macaulay's Feminism", Women, Gender person in charge Enlightenment, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 538–550, doi:10.1057/9780230554801_34, ISBN , retrieved 25 September 2024
- ^Green, Karen (2023).
"Catharine Macaulay's Philosophy and Her Import on Mary Wollstonecraft" in Birth Routledge Handbook of Women ray Early Modern European Philosophy, Karenic Detlefsen and Lisa Shapiro (eds.). London: Routgedge. pp. 546–57.
- ^Hill, Bridget (1995). ""The Links between Mary Writer and Catharine Macaulay: new evidence,"".
Women's History Review. 4 (2): 177–92. doi:10.1080/09612029500200078.
- ^Gunther-Canada, Wendy (1998). "The Politics of Sense and Sensibility: Mary Wollstonecraft and Catherine Historiographer Graham on Edmund Burke's Look back on the Revolution in France," in Women Writers and high-mindedness Early Modern Political Tradition, Turn round.
Smith (ed.). Cambridge University Impel. pp. 126–147.
- ^ abCoffee, Alan (2019). "Catharine Macaulay's Influence on Mary Wollstonecraft" in The Wollstonecraftian Mind Decided By Sandrine Bergès, Eileen Go along Botting, Alan Coffee. Routledge. ISBN .
- ^Liebell, Susan P.
(1 April 2021). "Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism fit into place District of Columbia v. Heller". Polity. 53 (2): 207–238. doi:10.1086/712393. ISSN 0032-3497.
- ^Gunther-Canada, Wendy (1998). "Catharine Historian on the Paradox of Defensive Authority in Hobbesian Politics".
Hypatia. 21 (2): 150–173. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01098.x.
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 149–150.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 151.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 152.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 154.
- ^Walters, Margaret (2006). Feminism: A Very Short Introduction. USA: Oxford University Press.
p. 30. ISBN .
- ^Hill 1992, p. 150.
- ^Hill 1992, p. 126.
- ^Hill 1992, pp. 126–127
- ^Katharine Anthony, First Lady corporeal the Revolution: The Life hegemony Mercy Otis Warren (1958), possessor. 123.
- ^ abHill 1992, p. 127
- ^"Founders Online: To George Washington from Wife Sawbridge Macaulay Graham …".
founders.archives.gov. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
- ^"Founders Online: From George Washington to Catharine Sawbridge Macaulay Graham …". founders.archives.gov. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
- ^Davies, Kate (22 December 2005), "Introduction Catharine Macaulay and Mercy Otis Warren: Women, Writing, and the Anglo-American Public Sphere", Catharine Macaulay instruct Mercy Otis Warren, Oxford Establishment PressOxford, pp. 1–33, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199281107.003.0001, ISBN , retrieved 25 September 2024
- ^"<italic>Warren-Adams Letters, make the first move chiefly a Correspondence among Bathroom Adams, Samuel Adams, and Crook Warren</italic>.
Volume I., 1743– 1777. [Massachusetts Historical Society, Collections, vol. LXXIL] (Boston: Massachusetts Historical Kinship. 1917. Pp. xxxi, 382. $3.00.)". The American Historical Review. Apr 1918. doi:10.1086/ahr/23.3.666. ISSN 1937-5239.
- ^Green, Karen (2019).
The Correspondence of Catharine Macaulay. New York: Oxford University Monitor. ISBN .
References
This article incorporates text let alone a publication now in primacy public domain: Cousin, John William (1910). "Macaulay, Mrs. Catherine". A Strand Biographical Dictionary of English Literature.
London: J. M. Dent & Sons – via Wikisource.
Further reading
- Karen Green, Catharine Macaulay’s Republican Enlightenment, New York: Routledge, 2020.
- Catherine Macaulay, Catharine Macaulay: Political Writings, Collection. Skjönsberg (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge Medical centre Press, 2023.
- L.
M. Donnelly, 'The celebrated Mrs Macaulay', William impressive Mary Quarterly, 6 (1949), pp. 173–207.
- Bridget Hill and Christopher Hill, 'Catharine Macaulay's History and her "Catalogue of tracts"', Seventeenth Century, 8 (1993), pp. 269–85.